Making apologies for Ferguson is getting harder and harder.
After I read the Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department report
and recommendations, I find little fault with its conclusions.
As I turned each page of the report I was ready to be Holder’s
critic and see his biased hand in every conclusion. As a researcher I was ready
to question assumptions and statistics. As a staunch defender of police
officers I was ready to point out unrealistic expectations and civilian
ignorance. In the end, the facts leading
to the conclusion that there is a pattern of citizen mistreatment, quite
deliberately encouraged by Ferguson’s city governance, are sound.
By way of critique, I see some argument in some of the anecdotal
accounts, but the damning constellation of facts collected leads to some clear
patterns. I also see little in the following public comment about
accountability of the citizenry for allowing these abuses to continue. However, I don’t
want to be among those who blithely write off “a pervasive lack of ‘personal
responsibility’ among ‘certain segment’ of the community”, even though closer
examination of that premise is an important part of whatever healing may come.
But that was not the DOJ mandate.
As a Missouri native with St. Louis connections I grew up
very aware of the prevalent racism in the city. My small town had no
African-American subculture that I could tell from the few black families I
knew. But even within my lifetime there were many towns posted with “sundown”
warnings that no blacks were allowed inside the city limits after dark. My generation watched the evening news as Dr.
King marched, cities burned, and police dogs attacked. As a boy I remember an elderly black man
stepped off the sidewalk to let me pass in a conditioned deference to a white boy, just
before I was going to step aside out of respect for his age. My dad had to
explain that. It is no surprise that these American experiences cast a shadow
over race relations a half century later. I also later learned that race hate was not a one way street.
What struck me most about the report was not that there was
a deliberate attack on black residents, but a deliberate fleecing of citizens
to fill city coffers. Given the power differential, the fact that black
residents were disproportionately affected as a byproduct of the city’s greed
is a natural consequence, creating a near indentured servitude. Indeed, laws
were made to be enforced and we use armed government agents for that
enforcement be it robbery or jaywalking. But the structure of due process must be designed with justice in
mind, not the clinking of silver. Fines for offenses and warrants for no shows
are for the public good, not for capturing citizens in a web of
extortion.
It’s my first time to commenting anyplace, when I got this post I thought I might also make comment due to the present wise post.
ReplyDeletejointtermfirst to die policy